IP02 vs IP58
Head-to-head comparison of two IEC 60529 ingress protection ratings.
IP02 and IP58 are both IEC 60529 ingress protection codes, but they differ in solid-object protection (level 0 vs 5) and liquid protection (level 2 vs 8). IP02 is rated for no protection and dripping water at 15° tilt, while IP58 provides dust-protected and continuous immersion (manufacturer-specified).
Engineered to deliver no protection against solid objects and protection against vertically falling drops of water when the enclosure is tilted up to 15° from its normal position.. Classified as IEC 60529 ingress protection code IP02, it pairs solid level 0 with liquid level 2.
IP58 is dust-protected and rated for continuous immersion in water under manufacturer-specified conditions. A niche rating for equipment that must operate submerged while allowing limited dust ingress.
Detailed comparison
The stronger rating on each row is highlighted in emerald.
Solid protection (first digit)
IP02
0 — No Protection
IP58
5 — Dust-Protected
Liquid protection (second digit)
IP02
2 — Dripping Water at 15° Tilt
IP58
8 — Continuous Immersion (manufacturer-specified)
Dust-tight
IP02
No
IP58
Limited
Water-jet resistant
IP02
No
IP58
Yes
Submersible
IP02
No
IP58
Yes
Outdoor suitable
IP02
No
IP58
Yes
The exact difference (IP02 vs IP58)
Solid protection
IP02
Level 0 — No Protection
IP58
Level 5 — Dust-Protected
IP02 provides "No Protection" (level 0), while IP58 provides "Dust-Protected" (level 5). IP58 is 5 levels higher.
Liquid protection
IP02
Level 2 — Dripping Water at 15° Tilt
IP58
Level 8 — Continuous Immersion (manufacturer-specified)
IP02 handles 0.3 mm/min drip rate (Dripping Water at 15° Tilt), while IP58 handles Specified by manufacturer (Continuous Immersion (manufacturer-specified)). IP58 provides 6 levels more liquid protection.
NEMA equivalents
No direct NEMA equivalent.
No direct NEMA equivalent.
Recommendation
IP58 offers higher overall protection than IP02. Choose IP58 for harsher environments; IP02 may suffice for milder conditions and can be more cost-effective.