IP04 vs IP14
Head-to-head comparison of two IEC 60529 ingress protection ratings.
IP04 and IP14 are both IEC 60529 ingress protection codes, but they differ in solid-object protection (level 0 vs 1). IP04 is rated for no protection and splashing water (all directions), while IP14 provides > 50 mm — back of hand and splashing water (all directions).
The IP04 rating offers no protection against solid objects and protection against splashing water. Water splashed against the enclosure from any direction shall have no harmful effects.. It is an IEC 60529 ingress protection code combining first-digit (solid) level 0 with second-digit (liquid) level 4.
Under IEC 60529, IP14 specifies protection against solid objects larger than 50 mm and protection against splashing water. Water splashed against the enclosure from any direction shall have no harmful effects.. It is an IEC 60529 ingress protection code combining first-digit (solid) level 1 with second-digit (liquid) level 4.
Detailed comparison
The stronger rating on each row is highlighted in emerald.
Solid protection (first digit)
IP04
0 — No Protection
IP14
1 — > 50 mm — Back of Hand
Liquid protection (second digit)
IP04
4 — Splashing Water (all directions)
IP14
4 — Splashing Water (all directions)
Dust-tight
IP04
No
IP14
No
Water-jet resistant
IP04
No
IP14
No
Submersible
IP04
No
IP14
No
Outdoor suitable
IP04
Yes
IP14
Yes
The exact difference (IP04 vs IP14)
Solid protection
IP04
Level 0 — No Protection
IP14
Level 1 — > 50 mm — Back of Hand
IP04 provides "No Protection" (level 0), while IP14 provides "> 50 mm — Back of Hand" (level 1). IP14 is 1 level higher.
Liquid protection
IP04
Level 4 — Splashing Water (all directions)
IP14
Level 4 — Splashing Water (all directions)
Both IP04 and IP14 share the same liquid protection: Splashing Water (all directions).
NEMA equivalents
No direct NEMA equivalent.
No direct NEMA equivalent.
Recommendation
IP14 offers higher overall protection than IP04. Choose IP14 for harsher environments; IP04 may suffice for milder conditions and can be more cost-effective.