IP13 vs IP63
Head-to-head comparison of two IEC 60529 ingress protection ratings.
IP13 and IP63 are both IEC 60529 ingress protection codes, but they differ in solid-object protection (level 1 vs 6). IP13 is rated for > 50 mm — back of hand and spraying water (up to 60°), while IP63 provides dust-tight and spraying water (up to 60°).
The IP13 rating offers protection against solid objects larger than 50 mm and protection against spraying water. Water sprayed at an angle up to 60° on either side of the vertical shall have no harmful effects.. It is an IEC 60529 ingress protection code combining first-digit (solid) level 1 with second-digit (liquid) level 3.
The IP63 classification guarantees dust-tight (no ingress of dust) and protection against spraying water. Water sprayed at an angle up to 60° on either side of the vertical shall have no harmful effects.. It is an IEC 60529 ingress protection code combining first-digit (solid) level 6 with second-digit (liquid) level 3.
Detailed comparison
The stronger rating on each row is highlighted in emerald.
Solid protection (first digit)
IP13
1 — > 50 mm — Back of Hand
IP63
6 — Dust-Tight
Liquid protection (second digit)
IP13
3 — Spraying Water (up to 60°)
IP63
3 — Spraying Water (up to 60°)
Dust-tight
IP13
No
IP63
Yes
Water-jet resistant
IP13
No
IP63
No
Submersible
IP13
No
IP63
No
Outdoor suitable
IP13
No
IP63
No
The exact difference (IP13 vs IP63)
Solid protection
IP13
Level 1 — > 50 mm — Back of Hand
IP63
Level 6 — Dust-Tight
IP13 provides "> 50 mm — Back of Hand" (level 1), while IP63 provides "Dust-Tight" (level 6). IP63 is 5 levels higher.
Liquid protection
IP13
Level 3 — Spraying Water (up to 60°)
IP63
Level 3 — Spraying Water (up to 60°)
Both IP13 and IP63 share the same liquid protection: Spraying Water (up to 60°).
NEMA equivalents
No direct NEMA equivalent.
No direct NEMA equivalent.
Recommendation
IP63 offers higher overall protection than IP13. Choose IP63 for harsher environments; IP13 may suffice for milder conditions and can be more cost-effective.