IP53 vs IPX5
Head-to-head comparison of two IEC 60529 ingress protection ratings.
IP53 and IPX5 are both IEC 60529 ingress protection codes, but they differ in solid-object protection (level 5 vs 0) and liquid protection (level 3 vs 5). IP53 is rated for dust-protected and spraying water (up to 60°), while IPX5 provides no protection and water jets (6.3 mm nozzle).
Built to withstand dust-protected (limited ingress, no harmful deposit) and protection against spraying water. Water sprayed at an angle up to 60° on either side of the vertical shall have no harmful effects.. Classified as IEC 60529 ingress protection code IP53, it pairs solid level 5 with liquid level 3.
IPX5 resists low-pressure water jets (6.3 mm nozzle, 30 kPa) with solid protection not specified. Used where water-jet resistance matters more than dust sealing.
Detailed comparison
The stronger rating on each row is highlighted in emerald.
Solid protection (first digit)
IP53
5 — Dust-Protected
IPX5
0 — No Protection
Liquid protection (second digit)
IP53
3 — Spraying Water (up to 60°)
IPX5
5 — Water Jets (6.3 mm nozzle)
Dust-tight
IP53
Limited
IPX5
No
Water-jet resistant
IP53
No
IPX5
Yes
Submersible
IP53
No
IPX5
No
Outdoor suitable
IP53
No
IPX5
Yes
The exact difference (IP53 vs IPX5)
Solid protection
IP53
Level 5 — Dust-Protected
IPX5
Level 0 — No Protection
IP53 provides "Dust-Protected" (level 5), while IPX5 provides "No Protection" (level 0). IP53 is 5 levels higher.
Liquid protection
IP53
Level 3 — Spraying Water (up to 60°)
IPX5
Level 5 — Water Jets (6.3 mm nozzle)
IP53 handles 80 kPa (tube) / 50 kPa (nozzle) (Spraying Water (up to 60°)), while IPX5 handles 30 kPa (Water Jets (6.3 mm nozzle)). IPX5 provides 2 levels more liquid protection.
NEMA equivalents
No direct NEMA equivalent.
Recommendation
IP53 offers higher overall protection than IPX5. Choose IP53 for harsher environments; IPX5 may suffice for milder conditions and can be more cost-effective.