IP69K vs IP14
Head-to-head comparison of two IEC 60529 ingress protection ratings.
IP69K and IP14 are both IEC 60529 ingress protection codes, but they differ in solid-object protection (level 6 vs 1) and liquid protection (level 9K vs 4). IP69K is rated for dust-tight and high-pressure, high-temp water jets, while IP14 provides > 50 mm — back of hand and splashing water (all directions).
IP69K is dust-tight and resists high-pressure (8–10 MPa), high-temperature (80 °C) water jets. The highest IP rating, required for food, beverage, and pharmaceutical washdown environments.
Under IEC 60529, IP14 specifies protection against solid objects larger than 50 mm and protection against splashing water. Water splashed against the enclosure from any direction shall have no harmful effects.. It is an IEC 60529 ingress protection code combining first-digit (solid) level 1 with second-digit (liquid) level 4.
Detailed comparison
The stronger rating on each row is highlighted in emerald.
Solid protection (first digit)
IP69K
6 — Dust-Tight
IP14
1 — > 50 mm — Back of Hand
Liquid protection (second digit)
IP69K
9 — High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets
IP14
4 — Splashing Water (all directions)
Dust-tight
IP69K
Yes
IP14
No
Water-jet resistant
IP69K
Yes
IP14
No
Submersible
IP69K
Yes
IP14
No
Outdoor suitable
IP69K
Yes
IP14
Yes
The exact difference (IP69K vs IP14)
Solid protection
IP69K
Level 6 — Dust-Tight
IP14
Level 1 — > 50 mm — Back of Hand
IP69K provides "Dust-Tight" (level 6), while IP14 provides "> 50 mm — Back of Hand" (level 1). IP69K is 5 levels higher.
Liquid protection
IP69K
Level 9 — High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets
IP14
Level 4 — Splashing Water (all directions)
IP69K handles 8–10 MPa (High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets), while IP14 handles 50–100 kPa (Splashing Water (all directions)). IP69K provides 5 levels more liquid protection.
NEMA equivalents
No direct NEMA equivalent.
No direct NEMA equivalent.
Recommendation
IP69K offers higher overall protection than IP14. Choose IP69K for harsher environments; IP14 may suffice for milder conditions and can be more cost-effective.