IP69K vs IP52
Head-to-head comparison of two IEC 60529 ingress protection ratings.
IP69K and IP52 are both IEC 60529 ingress protection codes, but they differ in solid-object protection (level 6 vs 5) and liquid protection (level 9K vs 2). IP69K is rated for dust-tight and high-pressure, high-temp water jets, while IP52 provides dust-protected and dripping water at 15° tilt.
IP69K is dust-tight and resists high-pressure (8–10 MPa), high-temperature (80 °C) water jets. The highest IP rating, required for food, beverage, and pharmaceutical washdown environments.
IP52 is an ingress protection code that ensures dust-protected (limited ingress, no harmful deposit) and protection against vertically falling drops of water when the enclosure is tilted up to 15° from its normal position.. It is an IEC 60529 ingress protection code combining first-digit (solid) level 5 with second-digit (liquid) level 2.
Detailed comparison
The stronger rating on each row is highlighted in emerald.
Solid protection (first digit)
IP69K
6 — Dust-Tight
IP52
5 — Dust-Protected
Liquid protection (second digit)
IP69K
9 — High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets
IP52
2 — Dripping Water at 15° Tilt
Dust-tight
IP69K
Yes
IP52
Limited
Water-jet resistant
IP69K
Yes
IP52
No
Submersible
IP69K
Yes
IP52
No
Outdoor suitable
IP69K
Yes
IP52
No
The exact difference (IP69K vs IP52)
Solid protection
IP69K
Level 6 — Dust-Tight
IP52
Level 5 — Dust-Protected
IP69K provides "Dust-Tight" (level 6), while IP52 provides "Dust-Protected" (level 5). IP69K is 1 level higher.
Liquid protection
IP69K
Level 9 — High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets
IP52
Level 2 — Dripping Water at 15° Tilt
IP69K handles 8–10 MPa (High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets), while IP52 handles 0.3 mm/min drip rate (Dripping Water at 15° Tilt). IP69K provides 7 levels more liquid protection.
NEMA equivalents
No direct NEMA equivalent.
No direct NEMA equivalent.
Recommendation
IP69K offers higher overall protection than IP52. Choose IP69K for harsher environments; IP52 may suffice for milder conditions and can be more cost-effective.