IP29K vs IP64
Head-to-head comparison of two IEC 60529 ingress protection ratings.
IP29K and IP64 are both IEC 60529 ingress protection codes, but they differ in solid-object protection (level 2 vs 6) and liquid protection (level 9K vs 4). IP29K is rated for > 12.5 mm — finger and high-pressure, high-temp water jets, while IP64 provides dust-tight and splashing water (all directions).
With IP29K, an enclosure receives protection against solid objects larger than 12.5 mm and resistance to high-pressure (8–10 MPa), high-temperature (80 °C) water jets. It is an IEC 60529 ingress protection code combining first-digit (solid) level 2 with second-digit (liquid) level 9K.
IP64 is dust-tight and resists splashing water from any direction. A solid outdoor-covered rating combining complete dust exclusion with splash tolerance, sitting between IP65 (jets) and IP54 (dust-protected).
Detailed comparison
The stronger rating on each row is highlighted in emerald.
Solid protection (first digit)
IP29K
2 — > 12.5 mm — Finger
IP64
6 — Dust-Tight
Liquid protection (second digit)
IP29K
9 — High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets
IP64
4 — Splashing Water (all directions)
Dust-tight
IP29K
No
IP64
Yes
Water-jet resistant
IP29K
Yes
IP64
No
Submersible
IP29K
Yes
IP64
No
Outdoor suitable
IP29K
Yes
IP64
Yes
The exact difference (IP29K vs IP64)
Solid protection
IP29K
Level 2 — > 12.5 mm — Finger
IP64
Level 6 — Dust-Tight
IP29K provides "> 12.5 mm — Finger" (level 2), while IP64 provides "Dust-Tight" (level 6). IP64 is 4 levels higher.
Liquid protection
IP29K
Level 9 — High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets
IP64
Level 4 — Splashing Water (all directions)
IP29K handles 8–10 MPa (High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets), while IP64 handles 50–100 kPa (Splashing Water (all directions)). IP29K provides 5 levels more liquid protection.
NEMA equivalents
No direct NEMA equivalent.
No direct NEMA equivalent.
Recommendation
IP29K offers higher overall protection than IP64. Choose IP29K for harsher environments; IP64 may suffice for milder conditions and can be more cost-effective.